Foster, Funding and the future of adult learningWhat strategies should adult educators look to? This event is now FULL
[Background] [Audience] [Programme] BackgroundLast November Sir Andrew Foster was invited by the Secretary of State for Education and Skills, and Chair of the Learning and Skills Council (LSC) to carry out a review of the future role of FE colleges. During the course of the review Sir Andrew invited written evidence from colleges and others, commissioned research and think pieces, held a series of meetings and workshops with key stakeholders, and also visited some colleges. Sir Andrew’s report, published on 15 November, sets out a vision for FE colleges and a clear set of values. It also sets out key recommendations that Sir Andrew believes need to be implemented if that vision is to be realised. The prospects for 2006 and beyond are not good. The Foster Review recognises the importance of further education but devotes little attention to the role of the colleges in widening participation and to the needs of adults other than those looking for basic skills and a first Level 2. The NIACE-sponsored report 'Eight in Ten' is more critical of what it describes as the unintended consequences of current policies and makes the case for a new approach to a lifelong learning strategy and to the funding of adult learning. It argues that insufficient regard has been paid to changing demography and to wider societal needs. These are difficult times for much of adult learning. NIACE has major concerns about the dangers of what it believes may be the unintended consequences of current policies, about the apparent disregard of demographic considerations. What strategies should adult educators look to? This conference provides an opportunity to engage in an important debate. Click here to read NIACE's comment on the Foster Review _______________________________ Audience
_______________________________ Programme
This programme is correct at the time of going to press. The organisers reserve the right to make changes to the published programme in the event of one or more of the advertised speakers being unable to attend. Delegates will have no claim against NIACE in respect of such changes. _______________________________ Also in January 2005... |