Across the world skills are now recognised
as a basic component of future prosperity. In
the UK, the acquisition and productive
deployment of skills have become
mainstream policy objectives, most recently
through the Leitch Review of Skills. Moreover,
as employment is seen as the primary route
out of poverty, skills are also accorded a role
in combating social exclusion and promoting
greater social mobility.
In reality, the relationship between
economic competitiveness and social
inclusion is more complex.
The argument that a strong economy can
support social goals should not disguise the
fact that there may be different ways of
prioritising investment in learning and skills.
For example, tackling low skills is more likely
to emphasise equality than productivity, while
a focus on high level skills would produce
different economic and social results. If we
want ‘social goods’ from investment in adult
learning, such as better health and wellbeing,
improved social cohesion, easier social
mobility, or community regeneration, we may
need to decide to pursue them explicitly as
social goods, even if they don’t immediately
impact on our economic competitiveness.
The last decade has seen significant
increases in the resources allocated to
further education in the UK. And yet figures
published by the Learning and Skills Council
in March this year reveal that one million
adults have been lost to learning in the last
two years. For those still wanting to learn as
adults there tends to be less choice with
employers increasingly in the driving seat, focusing initiatives such as Train to Gain and
the Sector Skills Councils on narrow
definitions of ‘economically valuable’ skills.
And yet for many adult learners the
motivation to learn stems from:
a desire to help their families.
get involved in cultural activities.
improve their confidence.
develop broad-based employability skills.
help out in their communities.
Research by the Wider Benefits of Learning
Centre has revealed that learning can have a
profound impact on adults’ lives:
it has quantifiable health benefits
can help steer people away from crime
encourages them to play a more active part
in their community
can support those wanting to develop skills
and knowledge for work.
Learning contributes to ‘social goods’ as well
as economic goals. It does so
privately - transforming us as individuals
and enabling us to sustain our family ties
publicly - through the collective benefits
secured for communities and our wider
society.
Public Value
Public Value is an emerging conceptual
framework which, applied to the learning and
skills sector, attempts to encapsulate a
broader recognition of the value of adult
learning. Public Value theory was first
formulated by the UK scholar Mark Moore,
who was concerned that all too often services
were ‘hitting the target but missing the
point’. In the UK, Public Value is currently
being explored by people working in a number of public policy fields including
health, policing, culture and sustainable
communities, as well as learning and skills.
It offers a framework for those involved in
providing public services to:
engage with their stakeholders
understand the needs and preferences of
the public they serve
plan, deliver and evaluate the impact of
services
through on-going involvement with users and
stakeholders.
Participants at this joint WEA/NIACE
conference will have the opportunity to:
find out more about and contribute to the
on-going campaign to promote the Public
Value of adult learning
learn from a selection of case studies of
good practice about what works in
securing Public Value in adult learning
learn about the findings from the Wider
Benefits of Learning Research Centre
find out about how leaders in the adult
learning sector can help to create Public Value
consider the role of learners as ‘social
innovators’ for adult learning.
The conference workshops will offer an
opportunity to explore dimensions of
Public Value in adult learning through
case study examples that illustrate:
wider benefits of learning, for example, in
relation to health and wellbeing, community safety, civic engagement and social
cohesion, and economic regeneration
the impact of learning on individuals,
families, and communities
what Public Value means for learners, and
its implications for leadership, partnership
working, and curriculum development.
Welcome and introduction from
the chair Richard Bolsin, General Secretary, WEA
10:20
What do we mean by Public Value
- context setting
Jenny Williams, Regional Development Officer - South East, NIACE
10:30
Keynote address: The wider
benefits of adult learning Dr Leon Feinstein, Director, Centre for Research on the Wider Benefits
of Learning, Institute of Education
11:00
Making the connections Roundtable discussions to formulate questions for the panel discussion
11:20
Tea/coffee break
11:45
Making the connections – panel
discussion Input from: The leadership - Lynne Sedgmore, Chief Executive, Centre for Excellence in
Leadership
What it looks like from the grassroots - Liz Smith OBE, Director, unionlearn,
Trades
Union Congress (TUC)
Developing responsive public services - Eleanor Passmore, Researcher, The
Work Foundation
Contributions to the panel discussion from:
Jenny Williams, Regional Development Officer - South East, NIACE
Dr Leon Feinstein, Director, Centre for Research on the Wider Benefits of
Learning,
Institute of Education
Peter Templeton, Director of Education, Quality and Strategy, WEA
12:30
Lunch
13:30
Case study discussion groups -
please see Page 5 for list of case studies
(please see the application form for more
details of each case study)
14:45
How do we influence policy and
the public?
Debate including key issues from case study discussion groups Citizens,
neighbourhoods, society and the State
Alan Tuckett, Director, NIACE
Prof. Bob Fryer CBE, National Director for Widening Participation in
Learning at the Department of Health
15:30
Close of Conference
(tea/coffee available)
This programme is correct at the time of going to press.
The organisers reserve the right to make changes to the published programme in
the event of one or more of the advertised speakers being unable to attend.
Delegates will have no claim against NIACE in respect of such changes.