JACE: Editorial
Volume 12, Number 1, Summer 2006
Mike Osborne, University of Stirling, UK
In this issue of JACE we present a set of articles that illustrate the
diversity of work that is being undertaken internationally under the banner of
adult and continuing education. Olen Gunnlaugson’s article is about dialogue and
the ways in which it is understood. In considering distinctions between a
particular theory, Scharmer’s generative dialogue theory, and conventional
perspectives of dialogue, he suggests that generative dialogue can support
transformative learning processes within collaborative learning contexts in
adult and continuing education. John Bamber’s small-scale and long-term 10-year
study of working-class students in higher education also focuses on the
classroom, in this case within the context of widening participation. He argues
that ‘active engagement in the teaching and learning process is more likely to
occur when course content, tasks, activities, and vehicles for assessment
systematically encourage and support meta-learning’.
Two pieces from Africa illustrate quite different issues. Firstly Akpovire
Oduaran, and Kolawole Kazeem explore the extent to which Education for All (EFA)
has been actualised in Nigeria through polices of Universal Basic Education
(UBE). They suggest that a focus on primary education has been to the detriment
of adult education and that a review of policy is required. Elsewhere in Africa,
Subrahmanya Murthy, an expert assigned to the Eritrean government considers in
some detail how information and communications technologies can potentially be
used to combat poverty reduction and lead to educational transformation in
non-formal education. The challenges as readers will note are great, though the
author provides some optimism for the future.
Mach Hines re-introduces to us a concept that seems almost forgotten in some
circles and one which are keen the subject of critical debates over the years,
that of andragogy. Acknowledging the debates around the validity of the
distinctions between pedagogy and pedagogy, he uses an instrument that measures
the preferences of men and women within school leadership (principal
preparation) programs for ‘pedagogical’ or andragogical approaches. Implications
of the results of the study for teaching are discussed.
Hazel Christie and Moira Dunworth’s article is also concerned with
professional development. It focuses on the experience of one student who gained
a qualification in Social Work against the odds. Whilst the authors do not argue
for the transferability of findings, this detailed illustrative account may
provide illumination for others in similar positions. A philosopher completes
this issue. Keith Hammond provides for us a review of the ideas of Alasdair
MacIntyre. This quotation from MacIntyre gives a flavour of the article:
To be enlightened is to be able to think for oneself; but it is a familiar
truth that one can only think for oneself if one does not think by oneself…
MacIntyre (1987, p 24).
References
MacIntyre, A (1987) ‘The idea of an educated public’, in Education and Values.
London: Institute of Education.