JAPP: Abstracts
Volume 1, Number 2, Spring 2004
Articulation and credit transfer in Scotland: taking the academic
highroad or a sideways step in a ghetto?
John Field, University of Stirling
Abstract
Scotland’s higher education system is characterised by a high level of
participation in courses offered through further education colleges. Current
Scottish Executive policy is based on the assumption that there is at least 50
per cent participation in higher education, which is seen as a consequence of
the growth of HE in further education. Closer investigation suggests that while
the initial entry rate may be around 50 per cent, those who enter HE in further
education are disproportionately likely to leave without achieving a
qualification; few who achieve an HE qualification in further education
subsequently progress to degree level study; those who do progress to a degree
course mainly enter lower-status institutions. Current Scottish policy,
therefore, makes only a limited contribution to increased social mobility for
students from less advantaged backgrounds. While some progress is being made on
articulation between FE and HE, little has been done to reduce attrition and
improve achievement within FE, and as a result the claim for a 50 per cent
participation rate disguises deep and entrenched educational inequalities.
Back to contents
Women accessing education: subjectivity, policy and participation
Penny Jane Burke, Institute of Education, University of London
Abstract
This article draws on ethnographic research conducted from 1997 to 2001,
focusing on the critiques and accounts of a group of mature students
participating in access programmes (‘Access to Higher Education’, ‘Return to
Study’ and ‘Women’s Studies’) at a case-study English suburban further education
college. The article focuses in particular on the white, working-class women who
participated in the study, to consider the connections between their gendered
and classed subjectivities and the contemporary discourses in play within the
policy of access education. It considers the meanings that the women bring to
their courses, including their desire for self-discovery through education. The
women found their way to education owing partly to a longing for ‘a space of
their own’. Their longing challenges the discourses of widening participation
found in contemporary policy documents, which construct access education as
primarily a functional and utilitarian bridge into work. However, the women’s
narratives also reinforce meritocratic discourses that construct access students
as individuals, outside gendered and classed relations, with natural qualities
and abilities, obscuring complex social processes of identifications, exclusions
and inclusions that operate within (and outside) educational sites.
Back to contents
‘Failure dances to the tune of insecurity’; affective issues in the
assessment and evaluation of access learning
Judith George, John Cowan, Lindsay Hewitt, Open University
Pete Cannell, Queen Margaret University College, Edinburgh
Abstract
This paper reports on the curriculum design of an Access programme in
Dumfries and Galloway which has taken 23 per cent of its intake of disadvantaged
adults successfully into FE and/or HE, and many others into employment. The
nature of the assessment, summative and formative, which was incorporated in the
integrated curriculum design, was critical to creating confidence, a positive
attitude to education, and thence to successful engagement with cognitive
demands. Data from the programme demonstrates the importance of addressing such
students’ affective agendas, and how facilitated self-assessment in particular
is a vehicle for ‘mainstreaming’ students from the isolation of disadvantage
into successful educational progress.
Back to contents
Solid bedrock or shifting sands? The risky business of laying
foundations
Kevin Brain, Geoff Layer and Ivan Reid, University of Bradford
Abstract
This paper examines the risks Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) run in
attempting to develop and deliver Foundation Degrees (FDs). It draws on case
study findings from two HEIs’ attempts to negotiate the risky business of:
initial development and steering a course between partnership, collaboration and
competition; securing employer involvement and moving towards vocational
provision; and using FDs to promote access and participation. It is argued that
the risks are generated by the ways in which FDs create processes of
detraditionalisation and individualisation to meet differing, if not
contradictory, aims - e.g. widening participation and addressing skills gaps.
The paper concludes by arguing that the extent to which FDs become embedded in
the HE landscape will depend on how well these processes can be negotiated. This
will require central government to reduce and redistribute the risks of
developing and delivering FDs. At the very least this will necessitate
addressing the tensions between the vocational and widening
participation/inclusion drivers of FD policy.
Back to contents
Debate and Discussion: @ccess denied? ICT as widening participation
Neil Selwyn, Cardiff School of Social Science
Abstract
Information and communication technology (ICT) is at the heart of current
multibillion dollar policy drives to establish inclusive learning societies -
primarily on the basis of the power of new technologies to widen access and
participation. This is despite strong criticism over the last forty years of the
inequable nature of ICTs in education as well as a recently emerging research
literature which suggests that ICTs are having little impact on overall patterns
of (non)participation in education. Given the evidence of the past four decades
years the received wisdom of ICT as a ‘technical fix’ for inequalities in
educational access could - and should - be strongly challenged on a number of
points. In order to frame a more realistic discussion of what roles ICT can and
cannot play in adult education this paper briefly discusses four popularly held
misconceptions of ICT-based education which urgently need to be addressed if the
equitable potential of ICT is to be even partially realised.
Back to contents
Debate and Discussion: Access to higher education among lower
socio-economic groups: a historical perspective
Sarah McNicol, University of Central England
Abstract
A commitment to greater participation in higher education by those from lower
socio-economic groups has existed for more than a century. However, many of the
barriers that were present at the beginning of the twentieth century, including
under-attainment, a lack of aspiration and admissions criteria, still featured
in policy documents almost a hundred years later. This may suggest that little
real progress has been made. By analysing and comparing policy documents from
the early twentieth and early twenty-first centuries, this article considers the
extent to which the ways of thinking about the question of access to higher
education for those from lower socio-economic groups has changed during the
twentieth century.
Back to contents