Path: Home > Projects > R&D > Key Findings > Embedded literacy, language and numeracy

Embedded literacy, language and numeracy in post-16 vocational programmes

The impact on learning and achievement

[Abstract] [Key Findings] [Recommendations] [Output]

Abstract

This research was led by the National Research and Development Centre for Adult Literacy and Numeracy (NDRC) with NIACE as a key partner, along with other research organisations. It examined 79 vocational programmes in 5 vocational areas: Hair and Beauty, Engineering, Health and Social Care, Construction and Business Administration. 1,916 learners, who were preparing for national qualifications at levels 1 and 2, took part. The study included embedded and non-embedded approaches in order to provide comparative data

Research methodology:

	Quantitative research examining ILR and personal data on prior achievements, initial assessments, attendance and achievement.
	Quantitative research using a questionnaire for learners.
	Quantitative approach using one to one interviews and focus groups.

Key Findings

The main conclusions of the project are:

Learners had better retention on embedded courses than on non-embedded courses.

Embedded courses had higher success rates than non-embedded courses.

Success rates were higher on level 2 courses, with 26% difference between embedded and non-embedded.

93% of those identified with a literacy need achieved a qualification compared with 50% on non-embedded course.

93% of those identified with a numeracy need achieved a qualification, compared with 70% on non-embedded courses.

Where a single teacher took dual responsibility, results were lower.

Recommendations

Further research should determine why embedded approaches seen more successful than non-embedded.

Output

NRDC published report: 'You wouldn't ask a maths teacher to teach plastering'
www.nrdc.org.uk

Funder: National Research and Development Centre (NRDC) for Adult Literacy and Numeracy
Duration: October 2004 – March 2006
Project Managers: Jan Eldred and Bethia McNeil
Emails: jan.eldred@niace.org.uk ;bethiam@nya.org.uk

Requests for ‘Key Findings’ in other formats, such as large print, are welcome. We would be pleased to consider your request.

	Learners had better retention on embedded courses than on non-embedded courses.
	Embedded courses had higher success rates than non-embedded courses.
	Success rates were higher on level 2 courses, with 26% difference between embedded and non-embedded.
	93% of those identified with a literacy need achieved a qualification compared with 50% on non-embedded course.
	93% of those identified with a numeracy need achieved a qualification, compared with 70% on non-embedded courses.
	Where a single teacher took dual responsibility, results were lower.