Colleges in their Communities Inquiry

157 group, NIACE and AoC logos

Colleges in their Communities, is a joint-inquiry examining the role that colleges play in their communities - led by NIACE, the Association of Colleges (AoC) and the 157 Group - and published its final report at the AoC conference on 15 November 2011.

Since the Commission started its Inquiry in January 2011, it has found that while many colleges are already firmly embedded in their communities they still have to negotiate an unduly complex funding regime. They see partnerships as an important way of embedding colleges in their communities, but recognise that these can be expensive in terms of resources and management time. However, local decision-making is crucial and engagement that involves employers, learners and the wider community in helping make these decisions and develop the college curriculum is the most effective.

A dynamic nucleus - Final report

A dynamic nucleus - Summary report

The Inquiry’s Interim Report was published on 15 July 2011.

Full details of the Inquiry's Commissioners can be found here - [PDF].

What are we aiming to achieve?

The Inquiry, Chaired by Baroness Sharp of Guildford, has reported on the strategic role colleges can play and the added public value they can bring in leading adult learning and serving local communities, at a time when colleges are expected to take responsibility for the shape and balance of educational offer to their locality.

How will we do this work?

The Colleges in their Communities Inquiry has gathered a wide range of evidence. This included a public call for evidence in association with its research partner CFE, a series of six expert seminars on key themes identified by the Commission and an extensive literature review that has encompassed international experience.

Areas for particular focus for the Inquiry have included how:

  • local planning mechanisms such as the Local Enterprise Partnerships (LEPs) can facilitate College involvement in planning and delivery to their communities in partnership with stakeholders in all sectors;
  • colleges can work with local councils and strategic partners to support economic and community well-being;
  • colleges can become fully involved in emerging localilities agenda;
  • colleges can support offenders in the community and ex-offenders;
  • college premises can be used cost effectively as a resource to their communities;
  • colleges can support non accredited learning as a sustainable model; and
  • colleges can collaborate more effectively in progression partnerships to deliver higher level skills.

Who is this work for?

Over the last two years, there has been a significant reduction in numbers of adult learning places. Government investment in Train to Gain and on full-time skills courses, in relation to young people aged 16-19, have had many benefits, but in some areas this has worked against colleges' intentions and desired aim to serve their wider communities. Such a shift over many years has resulted in fewer opportunities for adult learners and increased the reactive nature of curriculum development in colleges.

The Inquiry has develop a new strategy, reflecting existing best practice, to enable colleges to respond more effectively to learning requirements in local communities and help increase participation in learning.

What have we accomplished to date?

What is (or will be) the impact of this work?

A paragraph in the current Skills Strategy - [PDF] under the heading Freedom states:

"Control should be devolved from central government to citizens, employers and communities so they can play a greater role in shaping services to ensure that they meet their needs efficiently. We will increase competition between training providers to encourage greater diversity of provision, including, for instance, FE colleges offering more Higher Education courses. This, together with empowering learners by providing better information on quality and tackling poor performance, will drive up standards. We will free providers from excessively bureaucratic control and centrally determined targets and radically simplify the formulae which determine funding for adult education, so that providers can effectively respond to the needs of business and learners. For example, we have already removed the requirement for college principals to acquire a specific qualification."

The proposed freedoms present challenges to colleges to respond to the local skills agenda as well as the demands of employers and individuals. This will mean having a greater control over what is offered, how that 'offer' is developed and the pricing. How will these factors result in benefits for the communities that colleges serve? With freedom, it is argued, comes the responsibility to deliver not just institutional success but wider benefits for the local community.

The government consulted on a number of reforms to the further education funding system in the summer. This Inquiry's interim report, published in July, contributed to the process, so that adult learners can benefit from any changes to the system.

Contact Information

Mrs Amy Goodall
Amy.goodall@niace.org.uk
+44 (0) 116 204 5850
NIACE
20 Princess Road West
Leicester
LE1 6TP

226