Adult participation in learning
Mapping participation in learning is important for several reasons. Firstly, while participation is not always a sufficient condition for learning to take place, it is a necessary one! More importantly, participation in learning is associated with, if not a key determinant of economic, social and personal benefits. From an equity perspective therefore it remains essential to gather as much information as possible to assist in deepening our understanding of the familiar, but still central issues - who participates in what forms of learning opportunities, and why? Over the last decade or so, increasing efforts have been made to measure adult participation in learning, partly as a result of the establishment of national education and training targets. Determining an exact measure of participation however has proved to be difficult with variation between the results of different surveys on adult learning flowing from issues of scope - target population, definition of learning reference period - and of methodology, especially the different ways of asking questions about participation. The main sources of data used to measure adult participation in learning are:
1. The NIACE Adult Participation in Learning SurveyFor over a decade, NIACE has undertaken a series of surveys to measure adult participation in learning. These surveys have not only provided information on the proportion of adults participating in learning and a detailed breakdown of who participates and who does not, but the comparison of results within the series, enables the examination of how patterns of participation change over time. The NIACE surveys are based on a weighted population sample of 5,000 adults aged 17 and over in the UK and are included in regular omnibus market research surveys. The question used within the survey since 1996 has been drafted as broadly as possible to include all types of learning and in any mode. It is a question asked of individuals themselves, not in terms of levels or providers, and it asks the respondents to tell the interviewer what they are learning about without any further prompting. The findings are therefore useful in capturing the proportion of the population who see themselves as learners. Respondents are asked: “Learning can mean practising, studying or reading about something. It can also mean being taught, instructed or coached. This is so you can develop skills, knowledge, abilities or understanding of something. Learning can also be called education or training. You can do it regularly (each day or month) or you can do it for a short period of time. It can be full time or part time, done at home, at work, or in another place like a college. Learning does not have to lead to a qualification. We are interested in any learning you have done, whether or not it was finished. Turning to learning in general: which one of these statements most applies to you? I am currently doing some learning activity; I have done some learning activity in the last three years; I have studied or learned but it was over three years ago; I have not studied or learned since I left full-time education” A more detailed analysis of the origins and development of the NIACE survey series can be found in Adult learning and social division : a persistent pattern : volume 2. (Sargant and Aldridge, NIACE, 2003).
Headline findings from the NIACE Adult Participation in Learning Survey 2002Nearly one in four adults are currently learning, with 42% having participated in some learning activity during the last three years. Over one third of adults (36%) have not participated in any learning since leaving full-time education (table 1). The proportion of current/recent learners has increased by two percentage points since the 1996 and 1999 surveys, when 40% of adults said that they were current or recent learners (table 2). For the first time, men and women are currently participating in equal numbers, although more women than men say that they have not done any learning since leaving full-time education (table 1). The older people are, the less likely they are to participate in learning. The decline in participation is particularly steep for those aged 65 and over (table 3). Socio-economic class remains a key determinant of adult participation in learning. Adults in socio-economic groups AB are more than twice as likely to be current or recent learners than those in groups DE (table 4). Since 1996, current participation ahs remained unchanged for all groups except ABs where small increases in participation were achieved in both 1999 and 2002 The workplace is not only a major location of learning, but also provides information about learning opportunities and the finance to take them up. Those in employment are more likely than those outside of the labour market to participate in learning (table 5). Since the last major survey in 1999, the largest increase in learning has been among the unemployed, from 41% to 46%. There is a key divide in participation rates between those who leave school at the earliest opportunity and those who stay on even for a short while (table 6). Considerable regional and national differences exist in adult participation in learning (table 7). Forty-one percent of adults say that they are likely to take up learning in the next three years. Table 8 confirms the findings of previous surveys that recent experience of learning is a powerful influence upon whether adults expect to learn in the future. The headline findings and full report of the findings of this survey are available for purchase from NIACE (see resources section). For more information:
2. National Adult Learning Survey (NALS)The National Adult Learning Survey is commissioned by the Department for Education and Skills (DfES) to monitor the effectiveness of its adult learning policies, and progress in meeting the National Learning Targets for adult participation. A baseline study, covering a representative sample of 5,500 adults, was undertaken in 1997 followed by repeat surveys in 2000 and 2001. The samples for NALS 1997 and 2000 were selected from all adults aged 16-69 (in England and Wales), with the age cap lifted in 2001. Given the sample size, the NALS results cannot be disaggregated by LSC area, or by skills and employment sectors. In NALS, the respondents is asked a series of questions about different types of learning activities as is defined as a ‘learner’ if any of these activities have been done during the last three years: “Taught learning:
Non-taught learning:
The broad definition of learning used by NALS and the use of in-depth hour-long interviews mean that the participation rate produced by NALS is the highest of all the surveys. In 2002, NALS reported an overall participation rate of 76%. For more information:
3. English Local Labour Force Survey (ELLFS)The English Local Labour Force Survey is a partnership project between the DfES the Office for National Statistics (ONS) and the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), to provide for the first time, statistics on adult participation at a local level. The survey which began in 2001, uses a sample size of 60,000 adults, with a cohort of 12,000 added each quarter. Each cohort is interviewed quarterly 5 times - securing a sample size large enough to produce statistically robust data for each local LSC and each LEA area. ELLFS gives a participation rate for each of the 47 local LSCs, enabling realistic targets to be set for each area. In addition, ELLFS can track participation nationally among population groups who are priorities for widening participation, although some questions are asked only of the working age population. In 2001/02 more data were also collected in Wales through the Welsh Local Labour Force Survey, leading to significantly better local labour market data being available for Wales. Some of the questions within the surveys are limited to the working age population only. The ELLFS includes questions paralleling NALS’ broad definition of adult learning. In 2001 it reported an overall participation rate for adults aged 16-69 who had completed continuous full-time education of 74%. For more information: Contact LFS data service at lfs.dataservice@ons.gov.uk or on 020 7533 5614
References and Useful Resources: NIACE SurveysAdult learning and social division : a persistent pattern : volume 2. Naomi Sargant and Fiona Aldridge. NIACE, 2003. ISBN 1862011672 £16.95 Adult learning and social division : a persistent pattern : volume 1. Naomi Sargant and Fiona Aldridge. NIACE, 2002. ISBN 1862011559 £24.95 Two steps forward, one step back : the NIACE survey on adult participation in learning 2002. Fiona Aldridge and Alan Tuckett. NIACE, 2002.ISBN 1862011451 £8.95 Winners and losers in an expanding system : the NIACE survey on adult participation in learning 2001. Fiona Aldridge and Alan Tuckett. NIACE, 2001. ISBN 1862011257 £6.95 The learning divide revisited : a report on the findings of a UK-wide survey on adult participation in education and learning. Naomi Sargant. NIACE, 2000. ISBN 186201088 9 1. £24.95 The learning divide : a study of participation in adult learning in the United Kingdom. Naomi Sargant with John Field, Hywel Francis, Tom Schuller and Alan Tuckett. NIACE, 1997. ISBN 1862010161 £24.95 Learning and ‘lesiure’ : a study of adult participation in learning and its policy implications. Naomi Sargant. NIACE, 1991. ISBN 187941117 £12.95 Adults : their educational experience and needs. Advisory Council for Adult and Continuing Education. ACACE, 1982. ISBN 0906436176 Adult education : adequacy of provision. National Institute of Adult Education. NIAE, 1970.
References and Useful Resources: National Adult Learning SurveyNational Adult Learning Survey (NALS) 2002. R Fitzgerald, Ivana La Valle and R Taylor. Department for Education and Skills, 2003 National Adult Learning Survey 2001. Ivana La Valle and Margaret Blake. Research Brief 321 /Research Report 321. Department for Education and Skills, 2001. ISBN 1841856525. Pathways in adult learning. Ivana La Valle and Steven Finch. Department for Education and Employment, 1999. ISBN 1841850640 National Adult Learning Survey 1997. Sarah Beinart and Patten Smith. Research report 49. DfEE, 1998. ISBN 0 85522 720 6 (NALS97). Summary also available
References and Useful Resources: Local Labour Force SurveyAnnual Local Area Labour Force Survey. Office for National Statistics.
ONS, 2002 ____________________________________ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||