NIACE Logo
Logo Spacer
Border
  Skip Navigation
Latest News Latest News
Influencing Public Policy Influencing Policy
Conferences Conferences & Courses
Book Shop Book Shop
Campaigns and promotions Campaigns
Projects/Research Research/Projects
Information Services Information Services
Regions Regions
International International
 
Advanced Search
About NIACE About NIACE
Contact Us Contact Us
Links Links
Site Guide Site Guide
NIACE Membership Membership
Job Vacancies Job Vacancies
To NIACE Dysgu Cymru website
 
Path: Home > Information Services > Briefing Sheets > Mailgroups

PDF Version

Mailgroups (2)

This briefing sheet is based on our experience with the Making-IT-Accessible mailgroup during the period July 1999 to September 2001.

Introduction

There are many ways of using communication technologies to support learning. One approach that has been extensively used is an electronic mailgroup. This is a system in which by sending an e-mail to a common address all participants who form the group are sent the message. It is therefore possible to use the system for many purposes:

bulletSimply sending a message to a large group of people.
bulletObtaining help and support by asking a group of people with similar interests a question through the mailgroup.
bulletDiscussing issues of common interest.

There are no particular limits to the size of a mailgroup and examples exist of groups of less than 20 participants and ones of many hundreds of members. The initial applications were mainly to support groups of researchers and scholars who were separated by distance but shared areas of interest. Initially they were specialist discussion forums but have now developed to cover a vast range of topics and groups. There are many related to Further and Higher Education but they continue to spread across all sectors.

Mailgroups provide both visible and invisible discussion forums. In that you are aware of e-mails sent to the group but since each e-mail reveals the address of the sender it is perfectly possible to respond directly to the sender. Anecdotal evidence suggests that a great deal of all mailgroup traffic is invisible in that it is directly to the sender rather than to the group. The other phenomenon is lurking or simply reading the messages and never or rarely sending a contribution. It is difficult to estimate the volume of lurking but estimates suggest that for each contributor there are three times as many readers or lurkers. This suggests that like an iceberg a lot is hidden beneath the surface in both lurking and direct e-mails.

In June 2000 NIACE relaunched an existing mailgroup to provide a forum for participants in the DfEE’s Adult and Community Laptops Initiative. Membership was open to all participants and anyone else interested in the topic. The mailgroup was therefore an open forum aimed at the entire community but mainly intended for people working in some form of Adult Learning. The mailgroup is called Making-IT-Accessible.

 

Joining and leaving the group

The normal approach to joining any mailgroup is to send an e-mail to an address with a standard message. The mailgroup software then automatically enrols you as a member.

For Making-IT-Accessible participants had to e-mail Listcaster@niace.org.uk  with the message subscribe Making-IT-Accessible. Once they were enrolled they communicated with the mailgroup by sending e-mails to

Making-IT-Accessible@niace.org.uk

Some people found it difficult to enrol through a variety of reasons and they were enrolled directly onto the server. The problems are difficult to classify but were probably due to a lack of experience with e-mail communication or some small error with the enrolling message.

 

Moderation

All mailgroups have a moderator. This is not a role that exists outside of electronic communication but has features similar to facilitating a workshop, refereeing a sports event and managing a resource. It involves:

bulletSorting out problems with joining and leaving the group.
bulletProviding information to prospective members.
bulletWelcoming new members.
bulletEncouraging discussion.
bulletAnswering questions.
bulletProviding information.
bulletProtecting members from offensive messages and essentially. policing the Group.
bulletFacilitating discussion.

Styles of moderation vary but a great deal of the communication is by direct e-mail contacts so that it is hidden from the whole group. However, the moderator is also an individual member of the group so has a role simply as a participant.

An analysis of the moderator’s contribution in Making-IT-Accessible showed that during the mailgroup’s first month a quarter of all messages came from the moderator. These were mainly attempts to start discussions or answer queries in relation to the group. This high level of participation rapidly declined in subsequent months and was in the range of 1:10 to 1:15 of all messages. A majority of these messages took the form of providing information that the moderator judged would be interesting.

 

Good manners

It is important at the start of a mailgroup to agree some general rules to ensure that individuals are not offended or the group abused. Over time these are developed and enhanced and the group moderator needs to play a part in arbitrating when members ask for changes. Typical areas to consider include:

bulletOffensive language - messages will not make personal attacks on other members.
bulletAdvertisements - do you allow them? Often members want to inform the group about events, publications or services which they provide. Most groups agree that information can be provided so long as it is not excessive.
bulletAttachments - large attachments often take a long time to download so groups often discourage members from including attachments.
bulletVirus - attachments can be a source of virus infections so members need to ensure they do not send infected files and members also need to protect themselves against them.

 

Membership

The Making-IT-Accessible mailgroup had 278 e-mail addresses on 31 January 2000. However, the volume of messages does not closely relate to overall number of participants, with 17% of all messages being sent in the first month when membership was less than 100. Many group members have expressed satisfaction with the discussions and messages while admitting they rarely contribute. Anecdotal evidence from other groups tends to agree with this generalisation that

many people gain from the group by simply reading other people’s contributions. In January 2000, 45 different members contributed to the mailgroup. This is probably a higher proportion than in many other forums.

 

Nature of contribution

The individual contributions took many forms including:

  1. Individual questions
  2. Answers and suggestions to resolve problems
  3. Comments on issues which ranged from a single sentence to detailed response covering several pages.
  4. Many contributors offered information or advertisements
  5. Contributions to discussions

 

Volume of Mail

The pattern of Making-IT-Accessible group mail tended to be influenced by factors such as public holidays so that the month with the smallest number of e-mails was December while January was the highest.

bulletJuly 1999 17% of total communication.
bulletAugust 1999 14% of total communication.
bulletSeptember 1999 12% of total communication.
bulletOctober 1999 16% of total communication.
bulletNovember 1999 9% of total communication.
bulletDecember 1999 9% of total communication
bulletJanuary 2000 23% of total communication.

Wide ranges of topics were discussed but information and communication technology issues were frequent areas of debate. This is not surprising given the nature of the mailgroup. However, this covered specific technical issues, good books, ICT qualifications, curriculum matters and personal views. Other topics included funding of adult education, outreach, many practical issues and messages seeking assistance.

Appendix contains an update of this information for 2000 and 2001.

 

Benefits

The benefits of participating in a group have been reported (Rojo and Ragsdale 1997) as:

bulletKeeping updated
bulletGetting materials
bulletGetting answers
bulletLearning about the medium
bulletFeeling of belonging
bulletPossibility of expressing themselves
bulletEnhancing contacts

Other potential benefits include:

bulletSupport
bulletAdvertising (within the limits of group acceptability)

 

Individual Experience

The number of e-mails a member receives each day varies from none to many. If you have been away for a day or two you will find a lot of messages to read which may not fit into the work pressures you face. Since each participant is free to read and respond to messages when it is convenient messages can arrive in strange sequences. There can be long gaps in discussions and responses can move in several directions simultaneously. This can be confusing but most people find it a refreshing approach and have few problems following the discussion.

 

Conclusion

Mailgroups are a very useful way of sharing experience and providing mutual support.

Alan Clarke, NIACE

 

References

Rojo, A and Ragsdale, R.G (1997), A process perspective on participation in Scholarly Electronic Forums, Science Communication, 18(4), p320-341

Appendix - Update of Volume and Types of Mail for 2000 and 2001

Comparison between the same month in different years on: volume of mail received during the months and nature of the e-mails.

Definition of each category :

Communication - New people joining the mail group and introducing themselves, people who have worked on a project, usually write about their work, and some people tend to write about their area of work.

Information - This area consists of people mailing useful web sites to one another, usually regarding a specific discussion topic or report. E-mails informing people about forthcoming events, i.e. Laptop events, availability etc.

Other - People advertising job opportunities, recruitment taking place, etc

Questions / Answers - Any questions that people have asked, which usually attracts on average 3 answers to one question

Jan 00 - 21% of e-mails sent during 2000 Jan 01 - 17% of e-mails sent during 2001

bullet6 % Communication 11.5 % Communication
bullet35 % Information 20 % Information
bullet31 % Questions 16.5 % Questions
bullet21 % Answers 43 % Answers
bullet7% Other 9 % Other

 

Feb 00 - 9% of e-mails sent during 2000 Feb 01 - 23% of e-mails sent during 2001

bullet17 % Communication 8 % Communication
bullet25 % Information 20 % Information
bullet32 % Questions 16 % Questions
bullet21 % Answers 51 % Answers
bullet5 % Other 5 % Other

 

March 00 - 16% of e-mails sent during 2000 March 01 - 14% of e-mails sent during 2001

bullet17 % Communication 18 % Communication
bullet25 % Information 37 % Information
bullet17 % Questions 16 % Questions
bullet38 % Answers 29 % Answers
bullet3% Other

 

April 00 - 12% of e-mails sent during 2000 April 01 - 11% of e-mails sent during 2001

bullet25 % Communication 10 % Communication
bullet14 % Information 19 % Information
bullet13 % Questions 17 % Questions
bullet48 % Answers 47 % Answers
bullet7 % Other

 

May 00 - 8% of e-mails sent during 2000 May 01 - 3% of e-mails sent during 2001

bullet21 % Communication 16 % Communication
bullet8 % Information 50 % Information
bullet23 % Questions 16 % Questions
bullet48 % Answers 16 % Answers
bullet2% Other

 

June 00 - 6% of e-mails sent during 2000 June 01 - 10% of e-mails sent during 2001

bullet5 % Communication 15 % Communication
bullet23 % Information 42 % Information
bullet31 % Questions 10 % Questions
bullet41 % Answers 26 % Answers
bullet7 % Other

 

July 00 - 4% of e-mails sent during 2000 July 01 - 15% of e-mails sent during 2001

bullet43 % Communication 16 % Communication
bullet25 % Information 19 % Information
bullet16 % Questions 23 % Questions
bullet16 % Answers 42 % Answers

 

August 00 - 1% of e-mails sent during 2000 Aug 01 - 7% of e-mails sent during 2001

bullet40 % Communication 7 % Communication
bullet60 % Information 38 % Information
bullet7 % Questions
bullet48 % Answers

 

Sept 00 - 5% of e-mails sent during 2000

bullet15 % Communication
bullet28 % Information
bullet15 % Questions
bullet42 % Answers

 

Oct 00 - 7% of e-mails sent during 2000

bullet20 % Communication
bullet35 % Information
bullet20 % Questions
bullet25 % Answers

 

Nov 00 - 5% of e-mails sent during 2000

bullet18 % Communication
bullet37 % Information
bullet8 % Questions
bullet37 % Answers

 

Dec 00 - 6% of e-mails sent during 2000

bullet10 % Communication
bullet47 % Information
bullet10 % Questions
bullet26 % Answers
bullet7 % Other

 

____________________________________

< Back to Briefing Sheets Contents Page

Top Top of page