Background
Over the coming months, the Inquiry will be publishing a series
of interim papers on the Inquiry
themes, the implications of lifelong learning for different
sectors,
expenditure on lifelong learning, and the public value of lifelong
learning.
The Thematic Papers form the core initial substance of the
Inquiry’s work. They cover the following:
 | Prosperity, Employment and Work |
 | Demography and Social Structure |
 | Well-being and Happiness |
 | Migration and Communities |
 | Technological Change |
 | Poverty and Social Exclusion |
 | Citizenship and Belonging |
 | Crime and Social Exclusion |
 | Sustainable Development |
Demography and
Lifelong Learning, by Stephen McNair
This is the first of the Inquiry’s thematic papers, published on 20
January 2009. It reviews the evidence on demographic change which
shows that the normal lifespan is increasing; the population is
ageing and becoming more diverse. Alongside this it identifies
globalisation, technological and social change as key factors
meaning that most people will experience, during their lifetime,
more change than any previous generation. It argues that if people
are to lead satisfying and productive lives, they will need to learn
throughout this extended lifespan, constantly building and
maintaining their employability, engagement with society and their
autonomy and identity capital.
Technological Change,
by Simon Mauger
This is the second of the Inquiry’s thematic papers, published on 20
March 2009. It starts from the perspective that given the increasing
ubiquity of computers everyone will be affected by their presence.
It argues, therefore, that those engaged with lifelong learning in
any capacity need to better understand the implications of this, so
that future societies are the ones we seek rather than the ones we
end up with. It highlights some key implications and challenges for
the lifelong learning system, and argues for more attention to be
paid to the cultural, as well as the technical implications of
technology, in particular the ways it is fundamentally changing the
behaviours that we associate with teaching and learning.
Migration, Communities and
Lifelong Learning, by Stephen McNair
This is the third thematic paper to be published from the Inquiry
into the Future for Lifelong Learning (IFLL). This paper, published
on 22 April 2009, is about the implications for lifelong
learning of the changing nature of communities in Britain, and
especially of the impact of migration (internal and external to
Britain) on this. It aims to present as accurate a picture as
possible of patterns of migration and community cohesion in Britain,
but focuses on the broad trends and what they imply for what
individuals and communities need to learn. It argues that adult
education can speed up the process of integration into a new
community, helping people to quickly become a significant part of
their neighbourhood. This is true for people moving within the UK,
as well as from other countries, and should include rapid access to
first level ESOL (English for Speakers of Other Languages) teaching
for those who need it.
Well-being and Happiness, by
John Field
This is the fourth of the Inquiry’s thematic papers, published
on 2 June 2009. Written by Professor John Field, a
commissioner for the Inquiry, the paper argues that education has a
measurable impact on well-being, through all the stages of life.
That impact takes place at different levels: education has a direct
effect on well-being, by helping people develop capabilities and
resources which influence their well-being; it has an indirect
effect, leading to outcomes that in turn allow people to thrive and
increase their resilience in the face of risk; and it can have a
cumulative effect, by influencing the social and economic
environment in which people spend their lives. And the effects on
well-being themselves can be collective as well as individual. The
paper considers the challenges for learning providers to make more
of their contribution to well-being; for policy-makers and providers
to promote well-being through collaboration across policy areas such
as health, employment, social policy, culture and the arts; and the
need to develop well-founded approaches to measurement.
The Inquiry’s Sector Papers will discuss the implications of
lifelong learning for each of the sectors involved in providing
learning opportunities: pre-school, school, FE, HE, private
trainers, third sector organisations and local authorities. The goal
here is to encourage innovative thinking on how these parts do or do
not fit together, as part of a systemic approach to lifelong
learning.
Schools as a foundation for
lifelong learning, by Guy Claxton and Bill Lucas
This is the first of the Inquiry’s Sector Papers, published on 24
February 2009. It explores the role of school as a foundation for
lifelong learning through four themes:
 | the relationship between lifelong learning and the current
interest in happiness and well-being; |
 | the attempt to identify key personal characteristics that
underlie a positive or ‘healthy’ disposition towards lifelong
learning; |
 | the implications for schooling that arise when the development
of these aspects of ‘the lifelong learning character’ is placed at
the heart of their purpose; |
 | the implicit shifts in the ways schools are positioned and
understood within their wider communities. |
The Private Training
Market in the UK, by Lindsey Simpson
This is the second of the Inquiry’s sector papers, published on 26
May 2009. The paper examines the nature of the private training
market in the UK. It focuses on training purchased by employers
rather than by individuals. Whilst there is a body of statistical
and other evidence in relation to publicly funded training aimed at
employers, there is lower awareness among policy makers of the
nature of the private sector market and how it operates. The report
examines the market dynamics and the implications for learning and
skills policy in the UK.
This series of papers grapples with a range of questions about
how we should understand the benefits of lifelong learning. The
‘public value’ of lifelong learning resides in the benefits it
brings, not only to the learners themselves, but to the wider
society. If learning makes individuals healthier, for example, that
is good for them, but also for their family, their community and for
the health service and the taxpayer. It signals a general uplift in
the quality of life. This is public value. These papers explore
different approaches to evaluating the benefits of learning.
Lifelong Learning and
Crime: A Life-course Perspective, by John Bynner
This paper addresses the financial and other benefits to society to
be gained from lifelong learning as an antidote to crime. It starts
by setting out the evidence on the benefits of lifelong learning in
relation to crime and offending and shows the potential benefits are
high, but that current policy and practice does not enable them to
be realised. It makes a case for a life-course approach to analyse
the effects of learning. Finally, it adds a critique of how cost –
benefit analysis is used and urges for a broader approach.
Lifelong Learning and
Well-being: An Analysis of the Relationship Between Adult Learning
and Subjective Well-being, by Matrix Knowledge Group
This paper addresses the question of how far learning can contribute
to improving well-being. It studies the impact on a person’s
well-being of engaging in lifelong learning, and uses this
relationship to estimate the economic value of lifelong learning.
It suggests that undertaking part-time education, or having done so
in the last year, is associated with an increase in well-being.
However, having obtained a formal qualification at a later than
conventional age results in a lower level of subjective well-being
compared with obtaining a formal qualification at the conventional
age.
Lifelong Learning and
Crime: An Analysis of the Cost-effectiveness of In-prison
Educational and Vocational Interventions, by Matrix Knowledge Group
This paper addresses the question of how far learning can contribute
to a reduction in crime. It investigates the efficiency of one form
of lifelong learning – in-prison educational and vocational
interventions – in reducing offending. Specifically, by using cost-
benefit analysis, it attempts to answer the question: ‘is in-prison
education a cost-effective use of public resources, and what types
of intervention are most efficient for which offenders?’
The Impact of Lifelong Learning and
Poverty Reduction, by Ricardo Sabates
This paper summarises research-based evidence about the
impacts of lifelong learning on poverty reduction. It is a
contribution to an empirically based understanding of the complex
mechanisms through which education impacts on poverty reduction.
It starts by providing a definition of poverty and sets the scene
for learning opportunities for poor people in the UK. It reviews
literature on the income effects of adult education, the impact of
financial literacy, the employment and health effects of adult
learning, basic skills and health literacy and the impact of
lifelong learning on reducing child poverty.
|
|
|