A - Z of Inquiry Published Papers
Collaborative Local
Learning Ecologies: Reflections on the Governance of Lifelong
Learning in England, by Ann Hodgson and Ken Spours
This paper is an attempt to use ecological concepts that have been
developed across a number of different areas of human and natural
activity to think about approaches to governance in the complex area
of lifelong learning. The ecological metaphor helps us to recognise
important features of the diverse, dynamic, complex, evolving,
fragile spaces and entities that constitute adult learning. This
paper uses these tools to reflect upon strategies for building
effective, inclusive and collaborative local learning ecologies,
capable of meeting the needs of all learners in a locality.
Crime, by Professor Tom Schuller
Written by Professor Tom Schuller, Director of the Inquiry, this is
the fifth of the Inquiry’s thematic papers published on 15
September 2009. Crime and punishment cost us all a huge amount,
economically, socially and personally. Prison populations have
soared, taking us down a road from which it is difficult to retreat.
Prisons are full of offenders with very low educational levels.
Investing in better education and training opportunities gives hope,
and makes good economic as well as social sense. However, despite
some advances, this positive investment is currently not adequate,
in quality or size. This paper argues that if lifelong learning is
to have a reasonable chance of improving the crime situation it
needs to be linked to other and broader social policies.
Demography and
Lifelong Learning, by Stephen McNair
This is the first of the Inquiry’s thematic papers, published on 20
January 2009. It reviews the evidence on demographic change which
shows that the normal lifespan is increasing; the population is
ageing and becoming more diverse. Alongside this it identifies
globalisation, technological and social change as key factors
meaning that most people will experience, during their lifetime,
more change than any previous generation. It argues that if people
are to lead satisfying and productive lives, they will need to learn
throughout this extended lifespan, constantly building and
maintaining their employability, engagement with society and their
autonomy and identity capital.
FE Colleges in a New
Culture of Adult and Lifelong Learning, by Ursula Howard
This paper explores how further education (FE) colleges can make the
best contribution to a renewed system and culture of adult and
lifelong learning in the future, 15–20 years from 2009. It argues
that FE colleges have learned since their incorporation in 1993 to
work with more, and more diverse, adult learners than ever before,
although their work is currently hindered by narrowly cast policies
and inequitable funding regimes for adult learning. The paper draws
on FE colleges, past and present, to propose their future
contribution.
The Impact of Lifelong Learning and
Poverty Reduction, by Ricardo Sabates
This paper summarises research-based evidence about the
impacts of lifelong learning on poverty reduction. It is a
contribution to an empirically based understanding of the complex
mechanisms through which education impacts on poverty reduction.
It starts by providing a definition of poverty and sets the scene
for learning opportunities for poor people in the UK. It reviews
literature on the income effects of adult education, the impact of
financial literacy, the employment and health effects of adult
learning, basic skills and health literacy and the impact of
lifelong learning on reducing child poverty.
A Learning City
Perspective, by Ian Sandbrook
This paper outlines what a learning city is, what a learning city
needs and sets out a vision for lifelong learning. Specifically,
the paper explores the experience of the inception of Southampton as
a unitary authority in 1997 with its bold declaration to be a
Learning City.
Learning Though Life
(Inquiry into the Future for Lifelong Learning: Summary (English)
Dysgu Gydol Oes (Ymchwiliad
i'r Dyfodol ar gyfer Dysgu Gydol Oes) Crynodeb (Cymraeg)
Lifelong Learning and
Crime: A Life-course Perspective, by John Bynner
This paper addresses the financial and other benefits to society to
be gained from lifelong learning as an antidote to crime. It starts
by setting out the evidence on the benefits of lifelong learning in
relation to crime and offending and shows the potential benefits are
high, but that current policy and practice does not enable them to
be realised. It makes a case for a life-course approach to analyse
the effects of learning. Finally, it adds a critique of how cost –
benefit analysis is used and urges for a broader approach.
Lifelong Learning and
Crime: An Analysis of the Cost-effectiveness of In-prison
Educational and Vocational Interventions, by Matrix Knowledge Group
This paper addresses the question of how far learning can contribute
to a reduction in crime. It investigates the efficiency of one form
of lifelong learning – in-prison educational and vocational
interventions – in reducing offending. Specifically, by using cost-
benefit analysis, it attempts to answer the question: ‘is in-prison
education a cost-effective use of public resources, and what types
of intervention are most efficient for which offenders?’
Lifelong Learning and the
Early Years, by Margaret Lochrie
Much writing and thinking about lifelong learning relates to a
purely adult constituency and how they can expect to capitalise on
the benefits of an investment of learning within the span of their
own lives. Less attention has been given to the benefits of learning
for adults for the very youngest members of society, in particular
those whose lives are compromised by structural disadvantage. The
possible intergenerational benefits of a revitalised system of
lifelong learning provide the focus of this paper.
A Lifelong Learning, Local
Authority, by Tim Brighouse
This paper examines the role and different contexts of any local
authority determined to take lifelong learning seriously. The paper
has three sections. The first highlights the importance of identity
and context, and explores the key strategic role of the local
authority in acting as guardian of its local community. The second
focuses on the various internal practices a local authority can take
to ensure lifelong learning internally is effective. The third
argues for creating an accessible and changing bank of interesting
practice.
Lifelong Learning and the
Future of Higher Education, by David Watson
This short paper is based upon the discussion at the IFLL seminar on
Higher Education (HE) held in October 2008 and at the North of
England Education Conference in Chester in January 2009. It is
structured around ten propositions and explores issues such as the
position of part time students, student support and entitlement, and
credit.
Lifelong Learning and
Well-being: An Analysis of the Relationship Between Adult Learning
and Subjective Well-being, by Matrix Knowledge Group
This paper addresses the question of how far learning can contribute
to improving well-being. It studies the impact on a person’s
well-being of engaging in lifelong learning, and uses this
relationship to estimate the economic value of lifelong learning.
It suggests that undertaking part-time education, or having done so
in the last year, is associated with an increase in well-being.
However, having obtained a formal qualification at a later than
conventional age results in a lower level of subjective well-being
compared with obtaining a formal qualification at the conventional
age.
Migration, Communities and
Lifelong Learning, by Stephen McNair
This is the third thematic paper to be published from the Inquiry
into the Future for Lifelong Learning (IFLL). This paper, published
on 22 April 2009, is about the implications for lifelong
learning of the changing nature of communities in Britain, and
especially of the impact of migration (internal and external to
Britain) on this. It aims to present as accurate a picture as
possible of patterns of migration and community cohesion in Britain,
but focuses on the broad trends and what they imply for what
individuals and communities need to learn. It argues that adult
education can speed up the process of integration into a new
community, helping people to quickly become a significant part of
their neighbourhood. This is true for people moving within the UK,
as well as from other countries, and should include rapid access to
first level ESOL (English for Speakers of Other Languages) teaching
for those who need it.
Northern
Ireland Perspective
The Inquiry covers the UK and considers its four constituent
nations. This paper, written by Paul Nolan, considers the
differences in policy and provision with respect to lifelong
learning in Northern Ireland when compared to other parts of the UK.
Poverty Reduction, by Leisha Fullick
This is the sixth of the Inquiry’s thematic papers, published on
15 September 2009. Written by Leisha Fullick, one of the
Inquiry’s commissioners, the paper argues poverty contributes to
inequality and social exclusion, which affects us all and that
lifelong learning has an important contribution to make to poverty
reduction. Research shows that individuals who engage in lifelong
learning are more likely to have better employment opportunities,
higher incomes, better health and greater ability to manage their
money. This paper recommends ways in which lifelong learning could
be more effective in its contribution to poverty reduction,
including its integration with other policy measures.
The Private Training
Market in the UK, by Lindsey Simpson
This is the second of the Inquiry’s sector papers, published on 26
May 2009. The paper examines the nature of the private training
market in the UK. It focuses on training purchased by employers
rather than by individuals. Whilst there is a body of statistical
and other evidence in relation to publicly funded training aimed at
employers, there is lower awareness among policy makers of the
nature of the private sector market and how it operates. The report
examines the market dynamics and the implications for learning and
skills policy in the UK.
Schools as a foundation for
lifelong learning, by Guy Claxton and Bill Lucas
This is the first of the Inquiry’s Sector Papers, published on 24
February 2009. It explores the role of school as a foundation for
lifelong learning through four themes:
Scottish Perspective
The Inquiry covers the UK and considers its four constituent
nations. This paper, written by Jim Gallacher, considers the
differences in policy and provision with respect to lifelong
learning in Scotland when compared to other parts of the UK.
Technological Change,
by Simon Mauger
This is the second of the Inquiry’s thematic papers, published on 20
March 2009. It starts from the perspective that given the increasing
ubiquity of computers everyone will be affected by their presence.
It argues, therefore, that those engaged with lifelong learning in
any capacity need to better understand the implications of this, so
that future societies are the ones we seek rather than the ones we
end up with. It highlights some key implications and challenges for
the lifelong learning system, and argues for more attention to be
paid to the cultural, as well as the technical implications of
technology, in particular the ways it is fundamentally changing the
behaviours that we associate with teaching and learning.
Well-being and Happiness, by
John Field
This is the fourth of the Inquiry’s thematic papers, published
on 2 June 2009. Written by Professor John Field, a
commissioner for the Inquiry, the paper argues that education has a
measurable impact on well-being, through all the stages of life.
That impact takes place at different levels: education has a direct
effect on well-being, by helping people develop capabilities and
resources which influence their well-being; it has an indirect
effect, leading to outcomes that in turn allow people to thrive and
increase their resilience in the face of risk; and it can have a
cumulative effect, by influencing the social and economic
environment in which people spend their lives. And the effects on
well-being themselves can be collective as well as individual. The
paper considers the challenges for learning providers to make more
of their contribution to well-being; for policy-makers and providers
to promote well-being through collaboration across policy areas such
as health, employment, social policy, culture and the arts; and the
need to develop well-founded approaches to measurement.