'Learning Outcomes' project
Between March and August 2001, NIACE undertook an enquiry into learners’ perspectives on a range of current systems for identifying, recording and validating achievement in non-accredited learning. The aims of the research were:
The rationale was that learners’ requirements of such approaches might well be different to those of other stakeholders, for example those who deliver adult learning, those who manage it and those who fund it. In the current policy context this is more than academic curiosity. The key documents outlining the priorities, funding methodology and quality assurance arrangements for the Learning and Skills Council (LSC) all emphasise the centrality of learners. For example, the guidelines on Self- Assessment and Development Plans maintain that:
It is essential that the design of these developing processes, indicators and standards should recognise those aspects of learning that learners identify as being both in their interests and of interest to them. Without this, any system to fund, inspect or manage achievement will be significantly poorer and at risk of failure. The commissioning of this research by the Department for Education and Skills (DfES) was a welcome recognition of this principle and also of the paucity of evidence to support a proper understanding of learners’ perspectives on emergent systems. The context for this research includes a significant body of material addressing the principles and practicalities of identifying achievement in non-accredited learning. In particular, it complements a recent case study based examination of various current systems by the Learning and Skills Development Agency (LSDA). _______________________________________ Briefing Sheet
____________________________________ The Final Report
|