"Learning From Experience" page banner
 

Home
Developing Consortia
Embedded Basic Skills
Funding

About the project
Case Studies
Partners
Jargonbuster
Links
Feedback
Site Accessibility
Project Personnel

You are here: Home > Embedded Basic Skills > Good Practice > Degrees of Engagement

Degrees of Engagement

Consortia can engage with embedded basic skills delivery to varying degrees, and this will effect the nature and the way in which a service develops.

One major point, however, is that partnerships, of one kind or another, are key and that for a voluntary and community sector organisation to deliver a programme on its own is just about impossible, as without partners, building sufficient capacity to deliver effectively is most unlikely.
> Step by  step guide to developing VCS Learning Consortia

Three levels of engagement are popular:

1. - Signposting

  • The VCO activities include:
    • Screening and identification.
    • Identification of appropriate provision.
    • Sensitive referral.
  • Capacity Issues include:
    • Use of screening tools.
    • Availability and knowledge of providers and provision.
    • Basic Skills Awareness and Training.
    • Need for accredited Signposter training.
    • Quality systems development.

2. - Hosting and Brokering

  • The VCO activities include:
    • Signposting.
    • Identification of sufficient numbers of users for a viable programme.
    • Identification of a provider.
    • Progression signposting and support.
  • Capacity Issues include:
    • As for signposting.
    • Developing numbers of users.
    • Management skills and commitment.
    • Management information systems (MIS) development.
    • Monitoring and evaluation.
    • Quality systems development.
    • Suitable resources for hosting.
    • Relationships with providers.

3. - Provider Status

  • The VCO activities include:
    • Course design and evaluation.
    • VCS staff as teachers/leaders.
    • Continuous Professional Development.
    • Monitoring, evaluation of provision.
    • Maintenance of MIS.
    • Monitoring and evaluation of student activity and progression.
    • Funding responsibilities and accountability.
    • Relationships with funders.
    • Relationships with partners.
    • Development of quality systems.
    • A range of other activities relative to provider status.
  • Capacity Issues include:
    • As for the models above.
    • Developing appropriately qualified staffing.
    • Developing tutor support and CPD.
    • Developing funding sources.
    • Developing Quality Frame works and mechanisms to support them.
    • Developing Audit systems.
    • MIS development and use.
    • Developing systems to support AL Inspections.
    • Publicity and recruitment.

More detail on these models and their advantages can be found in Sections 3 and 9 of the RAP Guidance.
> RAP Guide

 

Back

Also in this section:

[National Standards]
[Core Curricula]
[Screening Tools]
[IAG]
[Individual Learning Plan]
[Planning]
[Qualifications]
[Quality systems]
[Staff Development]
[Degrees of Engagement]


NIACE Logo

A NIACE-led Partnership funded by:

ACU Log